|
Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submissions | Subscribe | Contact | Dental Links |

| Home |
| Current Issue |
| Past Issues |
| Submissions |
| Subscribe |
| Contact |
| Dental Links |
Spring 2001: Volume
25, Number 3 |
|
| Clinical
Research for a Better Practice |
|
| Posterior composite restorations
in primary molars: an in vivo comparison of three restorative
techniques |
|
This in vivo study evaluated
the clinical performance of class II restorations, in primary
molars after 12 months. Three restorative techniques were used:
filling the cavities in bulk; filling with three horizontal increments
and placement in three horizontal increments using pre-polymerized
composite inserts. The composite resin used was Prisma TP.H (Caulk-Dentsply)
with the adhesive system ScotchbondMultipurpose (3M). Initially
90 class II restorations were placed in 27 patients from 8 to
10 years of age and followed-up for 12 months. After this period
55 restorations were evaluated for anatomic form, color alterations
at the margins, presence of decay and marginal adaptation. The
results showed that all groups presented similar rates of wear,
the bulk insertion technique showed better results for marginal
adaptation, color alterations of the margins and less presence
of caries at occlusal margins, and that composite resin TP.H could
be used in class II restorations in primary molars. |
|
| Full Text | |
| © 2007 The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry |