|
Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submissions | Subscribe | Contact | Dental Links |

| Home |
| Current Issue |
| Past Issues |
| Submissions |
| Subscribe |
| Contact |
| Dental Links |
Winter 2001: Volume
26, Number 4 |
|
| Clinical
Research for a Better Practice |
|
| Barcoll hardness of dental
materials treated with an APF foam |
|
The hardness of a dental material
is generally related to its mechanical properties. The purpose
of this study was to evaluate the hardness of several resins and
cements exposed to an APF Foam (Minute Foam, Oral-B). Four molds
6 x 2 mm were prepared for each experimental condition with each
of the following materials: Filtek P 60 (3M); Silux Plus (3M);
Ariston pHc (Vivadent); F 2000 (3M);Vitremer Restorative (3M)
and lonofil Molar (Voco). Immediately after prepared, the samples
were stored in water or in the APF foam. To evaluate the Barcoll
hardness, measurements were made on both sides of the specimens
(top - T and bottom - B), immediately, and after 1 min, 24 h and
7 d. The results, expressed as percentages of the loss of hardness
of each sample from the baseline readings, were analyzed with
an ANOVA and Tukey’s test. ANOVA revealed the significant
influence of material, time and treatment. The surface analyzed
(T or B) had no significance. Among the glass-ionomers tested
the loss of hardness was significantly higher (+30%) than for
resin-based composites (±15%). Treatment with the APF foam
for 7 days produced the greatest loss of hardness (42%) and at
24 h the least (less than 5%). There were no other significant
findings. It can be concluded that the effect of the APF foam
is material dependent, but is significantly more pronounced with
the glass-ionomers than the resins tested. The application time
of the foam is the main factor for the loss of hardness. |
|
| Full Text | |
| © 2007 The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry |