|
Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submissions | Subscribe | Contact | Dental Links |

| Home |
| Current Issue |
| Past Issues |
| Submissions |
| Subscribe |
| Contact |
| Dental Links |
Fall 2002: Volume
27, Number 1 |
|
| Clinical
Research for a Better Practice |
|
| Tensile bond strength of
intracanal posts in primary anterior teeth: an in vitro study |
|
The aim of this study was to
measure in vitro; the tensile bond strength of three intracanal
posts used in anterior primary teeth. A total of 45 single rooted
primary anterior teeth were selected for the study and the crowns
sectioned leaving 1mm above the cement-enamel junction. The roots
were then assigned to three groups according the type of retention
used. All roots were endodonticaly treated, a 4-mm of the canal
was cleansed and a base of glass ionomer cement was put at the
bottom of the prepared canal. The roots were then prepared to
receive intracanal posts using a # 4137 diamond bur (KG Sorensen)
used in a depth of 3-mm of the length of the canal. All the prepared
roots were acid etched with a 37% phosphoric acid gel for 15 seconds,
rinsed, dried and the dentin adhesive Single Bond (3M) was applied.
Group I received intracanal posts and cores made of composite
resin (Filtek Z 250, 3M). Group II intracanal posts were made
from a 0.6mm orthodontic wire bent as a Greek letter type (gamma),
fixed with the Z 250 composite resin and cores were built with
the same composite. Finally Group III received intracanal retention
made of a fiber glass post (Fibrekor Post, Generic/Pentron) with
1.25mm diameter, fixed with Z 250 and cores were made like the
other groups. The samples were submitted to tension in a universal-
testing machine (Instron, model 4444). Statistical analysis (ANOVA)
reveled that there were no statistically significant differences
between the groups. On the basis of the results of this in vitro
study it was concluded that the type of intracanal post did not
interfere with the tensile strength and the most frequent type
of failure was of adhesive type, corresponding to 74% of the sample. |
|
| Full Text | |
| © 2007 The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry |