|
Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submissions | Subscribe | Contact | Dental Links |

| Home |
| Current Issue |
| Past Issues |
| Submissions |
| Subscribe |
| Contact |
| Dental Links |
Summer 2004: Volume
28, Number 4 |
|
| Clinical
Articles |
|
| Oral rehabilitation under
dental general anesthesia, conscious sedation, and conventional |
|
The purpose of this report is
to find the use of different alternatives for dental treatment,
from general anesthesia to conventional techniques, in patients
affected by cerebral palsy (CP) in a dental school setting.The
sample was divided into two groups: (1) children, and (2) adolescents
and young adults; 38 patients (20 female and 18 male) with diagnostic
of CP were included. Risks and benefits of conscious sedation
and general anesthesia were written into a consent form and these
were discussed with parents or guardians of each affected patient.The
mean age was 7.14 ± 2.2 years for children´s group
and 18.5 ± 3.06 years for adolescent and young adult group.Most children (77.3%) were classified as ASA II with a level of behavior I-II according to Frankl´s scale and these patients were treated under general anesthesia (GA). For patients that were classified as of positive behavior with little necessity of dental procedures, independent of the medically compromised level, dental treatment was done with conventional techniques or with conscious sedation. Dental frequency procedures were as follows: composites, dental prophylaxis, and dental extractions in children; in adolescents and adults, important to point out is that in anterior teeth and molars endodontic treatment, and surgical procedures increased in frequency. The mixture sevoflurane-propofol worked well during pre-, peri-, and post-operative procedures. During the discharge process, most patients needed a recovery of 20-40 minutes, after which they were awake and oriented, breathing comfortably with stable vital signs. It was concluded that GA with sevoflurane-propofol and conscious sedation are an excellent tool to provide dental treatment in CP patients in a dental school setting without most of the major postoperative complications, such as nausea and vomiting. |
|
| Full Text | |
| © 2007 The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry |