|
Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submissions | Subscribe | Contact | Dental Links |

| Home |
| Current Issue |
| Past Issues |
| Submissions |
| Subscribe |
| Contact |
| Dental Links |
Spring 2005: Volume
29, Number 3 |
|
| Clinical
Articles |
|
| Birth Delivery trauma and
malocclusion |
|
The aim of the investigation
was to determine the dynamic of birth delivery and relate to dental
occlusion among a group of adult subjects. The group studied was
made up of 106 subjects (57 females and 49 males) referred for
dental diagnosis and treatment. The average age was 26 with a
range 22 to 30 years. In data collection and analysis the following
were used as measures: dental occlusion (Angle Class I, II div
1, II div 2 and III) and type of delivery (normal, short, long,
caesarean and other). Results showed that among 106 subjects 72 (68%) had malocclusion versus 34 (32%) with normal occlusion; 24 subjects (22.6%) have been normal delivery versus 82 (77.4%) with non-normal delivery. Class I is present in 34 subjects (32%), class II division 1 in 26 (24%), class II division 2 in 22 (20%), class III in 16 (14%), and 8 subjects (6%) fall in the section “other”. Among 24 subjects with normal delivery 100% presented class I occlusion. However, among 82 subjects with non-normal delivery 10 subjects had a class I (12.2%) and the 72 (87.8%) had in the other classes, are distributed in the various subgroups of non-normal labor/delivery. None of the subjects with a malocclusion have a normal labor/delivery. Better understanding of the connections among osteopathic theory, craniosacral treatment and the outcomes upon dental occlusion, more rigorous evaluations are warranted. |
|
| Full Text | |
| © 2007 The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry |